

YOU WILL BE RE-DIRECTED AUTOMTICALLY
Please update your records to the new URL
(if your browser does
not support automatic re-directing, please redirect manually to the new
website, at:
http://cognitiveconsultantsinternational.com/index.php?siteID=3
Confirmation bias and other cognitive/psychological
influences:
Fingerprint, face, CCTV and other forensic & biometric
identification and decision making
We are a
group of researchers investigating identification by a variety of forensic
& biometric based tools. These applied areas of research bring together a
number of domains in human information processing in which we specialize within
cognitive psychology. These domains include pattern recognition, mental
representations, decision making, expertise, statistics, and knowledge
acquisition. These areas all converge together in the applied domains of
biometrics and the criminal justice system. Other areas of interest to us which
are vital for biometric and forensic applications are the use and integration
of technology and selection & training of examiners (including issues of
confirmation & other cognitive biases, and optimizing decision making).
We have
taken our expertise in these areas and our understanding of human performance
& cognition and have applied them to real world issues. Through Cognitive
Consultants
International
(CCI) we have provided training and consultancy to fingerprint and forensic
examiners on how to deal with and minimize confirmation and other cognitive
biases (e.g., to the Netherland National Police, the Israeli National Police,
as well as to Police Forces in the UK, such as Greater Manchester Police and
Hampshire Constabulary). We have also provided expert reports and testimony on
these issues to the courts (e.g., in the Levi Bellfield serial killer case in
the High Criminal Court at the Old Bailey in London and in the Troy Worsley double
homicide case in the Superior Court of Washington DC). We provided consultancy
to the UK Passport and Identity Services on reducing fraud detection through
facial recognition.
Dr
Itiel Dror, the Principal Consultant and Researcher at CCI, is currently a
member of:
·
Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Fingerprint Analysis
·
International Centre for Advanced Research in Identification
Science
·
UK-India
Biometric Digital Identity EPSRC partnership
·
British Standards Institute (BSI) Biometrics IST/44 Working Group
6 on Cross-Jurisdictional and Societal Aspects of Biometrics
·
International Centre for Research in Forensic Psychology
·
Associate Editor for the Journal Forensic Science Policy &
Management
and his work
into forensic decision making has been cited throughout the National
Academy of Science report on Forensics (2009).
For information
or enquiries, please e-mail: info@CognitiveConsultantsInternational.com
See
BBC’s
Newsnight interview with Dr. Dror on fingerprint identification reliability and
error, that aired in 2006.
For
a general paper on some of these issues, see the article Biased
Brains, that appeared in Police
Review in 2008.
For
a more technical article, see Meta-Analytically
Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts, that
appeared in the Journal of Forensic
Sciences in 2008.
Go to new website, at: http://cognitiveconsultantsinternational.com/index.php?siteID=3
More publications and presentations on
these issues (to receive copies, please write to Dr Itiel Dror Itiel@CognitiveConsultantsInternational.com):
Dror, I.E. (2006). Cognitive science serving security:
Assuring useable and efficient biometric and technological solutions. Aviation Security International, 12 (3),
21-28.
Sung, M., Johnson, J.E. &
Dror, I. E. (in press). Complexity as a guide to understanding decision bias: A
contribution to the favorite-longshot bias debate. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
Dror,
I. D. (in press). On proper research and understanding of
the interplay between bias and decision outcomes. Forensic Science International.
Dror, I.E. & Charlton, D.
(2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56
(4), 600-616.
Dror, I.E.
(2006). The psychology of police performance and decision making. Police Professional, 58, 37-39.
Dror, I. E., Busemeyer, J.R.,
& Basola, B. (1999). Decision making under time pressure: An independent
test of sequential sampling models. Memory and Cognition, 27 (4), 713-725.
Charlton, D., Fraser-Mackenzie, P., and Dror, I. E. (in
press). Emotional experiences and motivating factors associated with
fingerprint analysis. Journal of
Forensics Sciences, 55 (3).
Dror, I.E. (2009). The role of
cognition in expert performance. Forensic Science in the 21st
Century Conference. Arizona, USA.
Dror, I.E.
& Fraser-Mackenzie, P. (2008). Cognitive biases in human perception,
judgment, and decision making: Bridging theory and the real world. In K. Rossmo
(Ed.) Criminal Investigative Failures
(pp 53-67). Taylor & Francis Publishing.
Dror, I.E. (2008). Forensics in
the courtroom: An objective tool or a subjective prop? Psychology and the Law: Emerging Trends
Symposium. Psychonomic. Chicago, USA.
Dror,
I.E (2008) The role of perception: secure and deterrent in airports and
airplanes. International Air Transport Association Annual Meeting.
Seoul, South Korea.
Busey, T.
& Dror, I.E. (in press). Special Abilities and Vulnerabilities in Forensic
Expertise. In A. McRoberts (Ed.) Friction
Ridge Sourcebook. Washington DC: NIJ Press.
Dror, I.E.
(in press). Paradoxical functional degradation in human expertise. In N. Kapur,
Pascual-Leone, & V. S. Ramachandran (Eds.) The Paradoxical Brain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stibel, J. M., Dror, I. E., &
Ben-Zeev, T. (2009). Dissociating Choice and Judgment in Decision Making: The Collapsing Choice Theory. Theory and Decision, 66 (2), 149-179.
Dror, I.E. (2008). Confirmation bias. Annual Conference
of NIJ (National Institute of Justice). Washington, D.C., USA.
Dror, I. E. (2008). Expert
Decision Making: Confirmation, contextual & other cognitive biases. Society of Expert Witnesses
Conference on Trust and be Trusted. Swindon, UK.
Dror, I. E. (2008). Biased
brains. Police Review, 116, 20-23.
Dror, I. E. & Stevenage, S.
(eds.) (2000).Facial Information Processing: A
multidisciplinary perspective. (276 pp.) John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Dror, I. E. (2007). Perception of
risk and the decision to use force. Policing,
1, 265-272.
Peron, A. E., Dror, I. E., &
Bucks, R. (2005). The number of choice
alternatives in a decision making task: Cursed by, or spoilt for choice? 9th European Congress of Psychology. Granada,
Spain.
Schmitz-Williams, I., Dror, I. E.,
& Durston, H. (2005). Visual
features affect mental representations and transformations: curvature and
closure bias toward piecemeal or holistic processing in mental imagery. 9th European Congress of Psychology. Granada,
Spain.
Charlton, D., Peron, A.E., &
Dror, I. E., (2004). The interplay of perceptual and cognitive elements in
fingerprint identification: When higher-level cognition can facilitated or
hinder fingerprint matching. International Biometric Society, British Region
Annual Meeting. Royal Statistical Society, London, UK.
Dror, I.E. and Rosenthal, R.
(2008). Meta-analytically
quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(4),
900-903.
Dror, I.E. (2006). A holistic-cognitive
approach for success in technology. Biometric
Technology Today, 14(8), 7-8.
Dror, I. E. (2007). Evaluating scientific
evidence for the courts. Evidence in the Courtroom: Possibilities and
Challenges, Validity and Value. Institute of Criminology, University of
Cambridge. Cambridge, UK.
Dror, I. E. (2007). Perception and bias in risk judgments.
Metropolitan Police Seminar on Bringing Science to the Streets. London.
Dror, I.E.
(2006). The psychology of police performance and decision making. Police Professional, 58, 37-39.
Dror, I.E. (2005). Psychology and fingerprint experts.
European Forensic Science Meeting, Magdeburg, Germany
Dror, I. E., Charlton, D. (2005).
New contributions of cognitive psychology to forensic science derive from a
focus on the forensic expert perspective. 9th European Congress of Psychology.
Granada, Spain.
Dror, I. E., Charlton, D. (2005).
The vulnerability of fingerprint science and potential pitfalls in the
identification process. How can they be addressed and overcome? Fingerprint
Society Meeting. Brighton, UK.
Dror, I. E. (2004). The effects
of screening, training, and experience of Air Force fighter pilots: The
plasticity of the ability to extrapolate and track multiple objects in motion. North American Journal of Psychology, 6
(2), 239-252.
Ashman, O., Dror, I. E.,
Houlette, M., & Levy, B. (2003).
Preserved risk-taking skills in old age. North American Journal of
Psychology, 5 (3), 397-407.
Smith, W., Dror, I. E., &
Mander, H. (2003). The effect of training specificity on performance in novel
and related tasks. XX BPS Annual Cognitive Conference.
Dror, I. E., Langer, E.J.,
Houlette, M., & Ashworth, R.S.( 2001). Training and tasks demands that
restrict and enhance performance. Psychonomic Abstracts, 6, 85.
Baden, D., Dror, I. E., and
Warwick-Evans, L.A. (2000). The dynamics within and between decisions.
Psychonomic Abstracts, 4, 81.
Rafaely, V., Dror, I. E., and
Remington, B. (2000). Working memory capacity in old age affects
decision-making performance. British Psychological Cognitive Section Annual
Conference.
Dror, I. E. & Burwell, K.
(1999). The effects of prior knowledge on cognitive performance of older
people. 6th European Congress of Psychology, 141.
Ashworth, A.R.S. & Dror, I.
E. (2000). Object Identification as a Function of Discriminability and Learning
Presentations: The Effect of Stimulus Similarity and Canonical Frame Alignment
on Aircraft Identification. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6 (2), 148-157.
Ashworth, R. S., Dror, I. E.,
Snooks, S. F., Robbins, R.D., & Schreiner, C.S. (1997). Canonical and
non-canonical presentations during training determine the specificity of the
object representations. Psychonomic Abstracts, 2, 627. Philadelphia, PA.
Dror, I. E., Ashworth, R. S.,
Schreiner, C.S., Robbins, R.D., & Snooks, S. F. (1997). The primacy effect
on identification: Initial presentations during training establish long lasting
representations. Psychonomic Abstracts, 2, 628. Philadelphia, PA.
Schreiner, C. S., Smith, K. M.,
& Dror, I. E. (1997). Visual-spatial processing of objects presented from
canonical and non-canonical viewpoints. Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting
Abstracts, 25. Boston, MA.
Dror, I. E., Kosslyn, S. M.,
& Waag, W. (1993). Visual-spatial abilities of pilots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (5), 763-773.
Dror, I.E. (2007). Expert error in forensic
identification decisions, Psychology and the Law Symposium. British Psychological Annual
Meeting. York, UK.
Dror, I.E. (2006). The right for identity and for
anonymity in mirror of biometric technologies. NATO Advanced Research Workshop.
Jerusalem, Israel.
Dror, I. E., Charlton, D. (2006).
Policing and forensics depend on cognition, psychology, and the human mind.
Interpol Conference. Lyon, France.
Dror, I.E. (2005). Perception is
far from perfection: The role of the brain and mind in constructing realities. Brain and Behavioural Sciences 28 (6),
763.
Dror, I.E. (2005). Technology and
human expertise: Some do’s and don’ts. Biometric Technology Today, 13 (9), 7-9.
Dror, I.E. (2005). Identification, technology, and human
experts: Where might it go wrong? European Commission Conference on Biometric
Identification. Brussels, Belgium.
Dror, I.E. (2005). Psychological and cognitive elements
involved in biometric identification. Biometrics 2005, London.
Dror, I.E. (2005). Why should fingerprint experts care
about psychology? International
Association for Identification. Vermont, USA
Dror, I.E., Charlton, D., &
Peron A. (2006). Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making
erroneous identifications Forensic Science International, 156 (1),
74-78.
Rafaely, V., Dror, I. E., &
Remington, R. E. (2006). Information
selectivity in decision making by young and older adults. International Journal of Psychology, 41 (2), 117-131.
Dror, I. E., Rafaely, V., &
Busemyer, J. R. (1999). The dynamics of decision making as a function of recent
outcomes and possible consequences. 6th European Congress of Psychology, 86.
Rafaely, V. & Dror, I. E.
(1999). Avoidance payoff does not affect decision making by older adults.
British Psychological Cognitive Section XVI Annual Conference.
Smith, W. & Dror, I. E.
(1999). Configural Information Contributes More to Object Representation than
Featural Information. British Psychological Cognitive Section XVI Annual
Conference.
Rafaely, V., Dror, I. E., & Busemeyer,
J. R. (1998). The susceptibility of young and old adults to positive and
negative outcomes of recent decisions. Psychonomic Abstracts, 3, 41.
Dror, I.E., Peron, A., Hind, S.,
& Charlton, D. (2005). When emotions get the better of us: The effect of
contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 799-809.
Dror, I.E. (2004). Cognitive
psychology and forensic decision making. Royal Statistical Society Meeting.
London.
Dror, I. E., Charlton, D.,
& Peron, A.E. (2004). Evaluating
‘scientific’ evidence for the court: What contributing factors are really
involved in fingerprint identification. ICARIS. Sheffield, UK.
Dror, I. E., Peron, A.E., &
Charlton, D. (2004). Psychological factors involved in fingerprint
identification. Autumn Conference of the Forensic Science Society.
Bedfordshire, UK.
Peron, A.E., Dror, I. E., Hind,
S.L, & Charlton, D. (2004). Decision making processes involved in
fingerprint identification: The influence of emotional context on finding a
match. 14th International Forensic Science Symposium. Lyon, France.
For
information or enquiries, please e-mail: info@CognitiveConsultantsInternational.com